State v. Flores’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 861 (§ 420 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Blakely v. Washington · Crawford v. Washington · Davis v. Washington · Washington v. Recuenco · Watson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under that test, when the properly admitted evidence is so overwhelming as to necessarily lead to a finding of guilt, the error is harmless.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. GRENNING“specific words modify and restrict the meaning of general words when they occur in a sequence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hendricks
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.