State v. Magers’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blakely v. Washington · Rogers v. United States · Shannon v. United States · 125 Wash. 2d 24 - State v. Russell · 125 Wash. 2d 570 - State v. Gentry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a trial court's exercise of its discretion is manifestly unreasonable or based upon untenable grounds or reasons.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bashaw · State v. Fisher“`there is a substantial likelihood [that] the instances of misconduct affected the jury's verdict.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Reed · State v. Jones“the Court of Appeals has held that Blakely does not apply to sentencing under the POAA, Blakely being specifically directed at exceptional sentences. [ Ball, 127 Wash.App. at 957, 959-60 , 113 P.3d 520 ]. We agree with this conclusion and determine that Blakely has no application to the instant case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McKAGUE
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.