State v. Quismundo’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 122 Wash. 2d 299 - Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp. · 125 Wash. 2d 782 - State v. Vangerpen · 109 Wash. 2d 484 - State v. Pelkey · State v. Rohrich · 118 Wash. 2d 424 - State v. Markle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A trial court's obligation to follow the law remains the same regardless of the arguments raised by the parties before it.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A discretionary decision `is based "on untenable grounds”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Depaz · State v. Larson“Moreover, where an information is deemed insufficient in [the context of a motion to amend an otherwise insufficient information after the State has rested its case in chief], the defendant need not show prejudice to effect dismissal; the insufficiency alone is enough to warrant dismissal. The trial court here should have dismissed the charges against Quismundo without prejudice once the insufficiency of the first amended information was revealed; on this point the parties agree.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hockaday
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.