Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 164 WASH2D 739 - State v. Bahl

State v. Bahl’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Grayned v. City of Rockford · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Kolender v. Lawson · Miller v. California · Steffel v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) ... does not define the criminal offense with sufficient definiteness that ordinary people can understand what conduct is proscribed, or (2) ... does not provide ascertainable standards of guilt to protect against arbitrary enforcement.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he due process vagueness doctrine under the Fourteenth Amendment and article I, section 3 of the state constitution requires that citizens have fair warning of proscribed conduct.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “imposing conditions of community custody is within the discretion of the sentencing court and will be reversed if manifestly unreasonable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.