Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 164 WASH2D 943 - State v. Jensen

State v. Jensen’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2010
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Bell v. United States · Braverman v. United States · Snow · Grant v. Phænix Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[u]nless the legislature clearly and unambiguously intends to turn a single transaction into multiple offenses, the rule of lenity requires a court to resolve ambiguity in favor of one offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a separate unit of prosecution arises when the facts support the conclusion the defendant enticed a different person, at a different time and place, to commit a distinct crime”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.