164 W. Va. 718 - Moore v. Whyte’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 2002
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on United States v. Mauro · United States v. Ford · United States v. Scallion · United States v. Mauro · United States v. Sorrell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]n the event that an action on the indictment ... on the basis of which the detainer has been lodged is not brought to trial within the period provided in Article III ... hereof, the appropriate court of the jurisdiction where the indictment ... has been pending shall enter an order dismissing the same with prejudice, and any detainer based thereon shall cease to be of any force or effect.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State · State v. Seenes“(e) In respect of any proceeding made possible by this article, trial shall be commenced within one hundred twenty days of the arrival of the prisoner in the receiving state, but for good cause shown in open court, the prisoner or his counsel being present, the court having jurisdiction of the matter may grant any necessary or reasonable continuance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he failure of the State to bring the accused to trial within 180 days following the State’s receipt of the petitioner’s notice of imprisonment and l'equest for final disposition of the case, pursuant to the Agreement on Detainers, W. Va.Code, 62-14-1, article 111(a) and article V(c) [1971], mandates the dismissal of the indictments pending against the petitioner ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Seenes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.