165 Conn. App. 576 - Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2020
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · State v. Whipper · Asherman v. State · State v. Hammond
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not, of course, necessarily imply that neither had contact with the jacket or that the petitioner was never in the victim's car. The results simply demonstrate [that] their DNA was not detected on or in the items tested.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State“the methods used to perform the DNA analyses were scientifically appropriate, that the methods were expertly executed, and that the outcomes obtained were accurate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.