Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 165 F.1d 112 - In re Cameron

In re Cameron’s Empirical Analysis

165 F. 112 · 1908

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
March 1921
most recently cited

2 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The statute contemplates continuous inhabitancy, after the first step is taken, up to and including the time of admission, during which the intention to become a citizen must in fact continue. An applicant cannot hold a divided allegiance, in part to his native country, to be resumed at will, and in part to that of his adoption, to be availed of at pleasure. He owes undivided allegiance during the probationary period,; otherwise, he could continue his relations with the country of his citizenship unto the day of his final proof, which would neither be within the spirit of the statute regarding residence nor within its provisions as to the bona fide intention to become a citizen.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.