Fox v. Knickerbocker Engraving Co.’s Empirical Analysis
165 F. 442 · 1908
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 2013
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press · Topliff v. Topliff · Day v. Woodworth · Jones v. Morehead · National Folding-Box & Paper Co. v. Elsas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“subjected the complainants to a long and expensive litigation which might easily have been avoided if a license had been taken, [the lower court, in awarding increased damages] may well have thought that the damages which it was possible to prove were inadequate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“although this was not done maliciously or for the purposes of concealment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.