Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 165 F.1d 636 - Carpenter v. Winn

Carpenter v. Winn’s Empirical Analysis

165 F. 636 · 1908

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
May 1911
most recently cited

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Victor G. Bloede Co. of Baltimore City v. Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co. · Cassatt v. Mitchell Coal & Coke Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The decisions rendered in different districts are not harmonious. A very full review of these decisions will be found in Bloede v. Bancroft (0. 0.) 98 Fed. 175 , where it was held that production of the books in advance of trial could be required. Since that decision, however, the Circuit Court of Appeals in the Third Circuit has held the other way. Cassatt v. Mitchell Coal & Coke Co., 150 Fed. 32 , 81 O. C. A. 80 , 10 L. R. A. (N. S.) 99 . A majority of us are in accord with the reasoning aDd conclusion in Bloede v. Bancroft, and since the practice there approved has been the practice in this circuit for several years, and is in harmony with the provisions of the state Code of Procedure, we are unwilling to adopt the conclusions of the Circuit Court of Appeals of the Third Circuit. Moreover, the weight of decisions in the different circuits seems to be in accord with Bloede v. Bancroft. It is unfortunate, perhaps, that there should be diversity in the practice in different circuits; but the remedy for that would be an application for certiorari to the Supreme Court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.