Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 165 F.2d 111 - Texas Co. v. Miller

Texas Co. v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

165 F.2d 111 · 1947

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 2009 · most notably Doing v. Riley (1949), Systems Corporation v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (1982)

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

701947195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Faires v. Cockerell · Gerseta Corporation v. Equitable Trust Co. · Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Napoleon Hill Cotton Co. · First National Bank of Houston v. Ackerman · Galbraith-Foxworth Lumber Co. v. Long

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We do not have here a case of conventional subrogation but of legal subrogation that arises by operation of law. ‘Subrogation arises by operation of law where a person has been compelled to pay off a prior encumbrance in order to protect himself, or where he has paid the debt of another in such circumstances that equity will afford him the security or obligation held by the creditor whose claim has been paid’.” (Emphasis supplied).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Equity does not look with favor on the unjust enrichment of one person at the expense of another.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.