Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

165 F.2d 409

Docket No. 13627.

Brown v. United States

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Jan. 13, 1948.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1948-01-13

2 counsel of record

Relies on Wright v. United States · King v. United States · Brown v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1948-01-13

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 1967

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

40194819501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1See also 160 F.2d 310.

¶2Submitted on brief for appellant.

¶3R. S. Wilson, U. S. Atty., David R. Boatright, Asst. U. S. Atty., and Chas. A. Beasley, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., all of Ft. Smith, Ark., for appellee.

¶4Before SANBORN, JOHNSEN and RIDDICK, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6The question on the appeal is the same as in Wright v. United States, 8 Cir., 165 F.2d 405, and King v. United States, 8 Cir., 165 F.2d 408, this date decided.

¶7For the reasons stated in those opinions, the trial court did not err in denying appellant’s motion to vacate the judgment of conviction and sentence against him on the ground that women had been intentionally and systematically excluded from the panel of grand jurors in the Western District of Arkansas, by which he was indicted.

¶8Affirmed.

/165/f2d/409 · .json · Public domain