Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 165 F.2d 412 - Bagwell v. Susman

Bagwell v. Susman’s Empirical Analysis

165 F.2d 412 · 1947

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
3
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2012

12 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

6019471950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tinius Olsen Testing MacHine Co. v. Wolf Co. · Lamborn & Co. v. Green & Green · Grissom v. Commerial National Bank · Charles v. Carter · Clyde Equipment Co. v. Fiorito

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On the question of rescission, it would appear that if reasonable men might differ as to the inferences to be drawn from either conflicting or undisputed facts, the question whether there was a rescission or whether there was an intention to rescind would be a question of fact for the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.