Bain v. Hasselstrom’s Empirical Analysis
165 F.2d 436 · 1947
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
June 1964
most recently cited
Relationships
Relies on 26 App. D.C. 8 - Allen v. United States ex rel. Lowry · Dalton v. Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where claims are suggested to an applicant for interference purposes such action is deemed, as held in the above referred to Coulson v. Callender et al. decision, a new action in the case. In effect such action is an offer to the applicant of the allowance of claims for his invention if presented in the suggested form and if he can prove he is the prior inventor. The provisions of Rule 77 are not deemed to extend to actions in cases in which claims are suggested for interference provided of course such claims are presented within the designated period.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“complete and proper action as the condition of the case may require”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“shall be regarded as abandoned by the parties thereto.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.