Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 165 F.2d 483 - Limericks, Inc. v. Commissioner

Limericks, Inc. v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

165 F.2d 483 · 1948

Citation profile

77
cited by 77 later decisions
1
states following
March 2002
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently March 2002 · most notably Loftin & Woodard, Inc. v. United States (1978), Ruth T. Lengsfield, Coralie Mayer Lengsfield and Blanche L. Brown v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (1957)

35 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

2501948195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gregory v. Helvering · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Court Holding Co · Higgins v. Smith · Dobson v. Commissioner · Dobson v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““§ 23. Deductions from gross income. In computing net income there shall be allowed as deductions: [As amended by Sec. 121(a), Revenue Act of 1942, c. 619, 56 Stat. 798 ] “(a) Expenses. “(1) Trade or business expenses. “(A) In general. — All the ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business, including a reasonable allowance for salaries or other compensation for personal services actually rendered; traveling expenses (including the entire amount expended for meals and lodging) while away from home in the pursuit of a trade or business ; and rentals or other payments required to be made as a condition to the continued use or possession, for purposes of the trade or business, of property to which the taxpayer has not taken or is not taking title or in which he has no equity.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “required * * * as a condition to the continued use * * * of property,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.