In Re Ggm, P.C.’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 2023
3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pro-Snax Distributors Inc Andrews Kurth Llp v. Family Snacks Inc · Tanenbaum v. Economics Laboratory, Inc. · Maranatha Temple, Inc. v. Enterprise Products Company · Snap-On Tools, Inc. v. Freeman · First Interstate Bank of Arizona, N.A. v. Interfund Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“even if an issue is argued in the Bankruptcy Court and ruled on by that court, it is not preserved for appeal under Rule 8006 unless the appellant includes the issue in its statement of issues on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.