Fultz v. Dunn’s Empirical Analysis
165 F.3d 215 · 1998
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 2019
5 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership · Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp. · Swineford v. Snyder County Pennsylvania
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“only if, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmovant and giving it the advantage of every fair and reasonable inference, there is insufficient evidence from which a jury reasonably could find liability.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“did not bargain for recognition of seniority based on his terminated employment in the settlement agreement.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States v. State of New Jersey New Jersey State Department of Personnel Eugene McCaffrey Ronald Burkhardt Donna Roman Mary Vasquez Cecilia A. Shinn Carrie E. Reed v. New Jersey Dept. Of Personnel City of Newark Armadina Tahaney v. New Jersey Department of Personnel Merit System Board State of New Jersey New Jersey State Department of Personnel and Anthony J. Cimino, Commissioner of Personnel, New Jersey State Department of Personnel · United States of America v. State of New Jersey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.