Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 165 F.3d 733 - Milne v. Hillblom

Milne v. Hillblom’s Empirical Analysis

165 F.3d 733 · 1999

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
October 2013
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently October 2013 · most notably Minh Duc Luu-Le v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (2000), Amado Miranda Esperanza Miranda v. Janet Reno Does 1-100 (2001)

11 federal appellate ·

290199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 48 U.S.C. § 1824

Relies on Boggs v. Boggs · McLinn F/v Fjord Johnson F/v Supersonic Churchill v. F/v Fjord F/v Supersonic F/v Supersonic · Collins v. City of San Diego · Entertainment Research Group, Inc. v. Genesis Creative Group, Inc. · United States v. Tisor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “have jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions of the highest court of the Northern Mariana Islands from which a decision could be had in all cases involving the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States, or any authority exercised thereunder . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]his court will review federal issues even if not properly raised in the Common- wealth Court, however, if that court in fact passed upon those issues. We do not reach purported federal questions neither raised nor decided by the CNMI Supreme Court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.