165 F. Supp. 2d 1096 - Abrams Shell v. Shell Oil Co.’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 2805 (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · Milliken v. Meyer · Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co. · Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must be satisfied for each and every named plaintiff for the suit to go forward.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.