165 F. Supp. 2d 114 - Hall v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 2023
4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 1801 (American Fisheries Promotion Act) · 16 U.S.C. § 1802 · 16 U.S.C. § 1851 (Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act) · 16 U.S.C. § 1852 · 16 U.S.C. § 1854 (International Fisheries Agreement Clarification Act) · 16 U.S.C. § 1855 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 5 U.S.C. § 601 (Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Camp v. Pitts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Conservation and management measures shall not discriminate between residents of different States. If it becomes necessary to allocate or assign fishing privileges among various United States fishermen, such allocation shall be (A) fair and equitable to all such fishermen; (B) reasonably calculated to promote conservation; and (C) carried out in such manner that no particular individu al, corporation, or other entity acquires an excessive share of such privileges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the agency has relied on factors which Congress has not intended it to consider, entirely failed to consider an important aspect of the problem, offered an explanation for its decision that runs counter to the evidence before the agency, or is so implausible that it could not be ascribed to a difference in view or the product of agency expertise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The terms 'overfishing' and 'overfished' mean a rate or level of fishing mortality that jeopardizes the capacity of a fishery to produce the maximum sustainable yield on a continuing basis.” 16 U.S.C. § 1802 (29). Maximum sustainable yield is in turn defined as the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.