165 F. Supp. 2d 1164 - Roe v. Gray’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1601 (§ 102 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1679 · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 11 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 3 · 9 U.S.C. § 4 · 9 U.S.C. § 9
Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · M/s Bremen v. Zapata off-Shore Company · Southland Corp. v. Keating · Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A party aggrieved by the alleged failure, neglect, or refusal of another to arbitrate under a written agreement for arbitration may petition any United States district court which, save for such agreement, would have jurisdiction under Title 28, in a civil action ... arising out of the controversy between the parties, for an order directing that such arbitration proceed in the manner provided for in such agreement. Five days’ notice in writing of such application shall be served upon the party in default. ... The court shall hear the parties, and upon being satisfied that the making of the agreement for arbitration or the failure to comply therewith is not in issue, the court shall make an order directing the parties to proceed to arbitration in accordance with the terms of the agreement....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the United States court in and for the district wherein the award was made may make an order modifying or correcting the award upon the application of any party to the arbitration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“application may be made to the United States court in and for the district within which such award was made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.