Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 165 F. Supp. 3d 147 - Giuffre v. Maxwell

165 F. Supp. 3d 147 - Giuffre v. Maxwell’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
January 2019
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp. · Arista Records LLC v. Doe 3 · Lino Celle Radio Mindanao Network Usa Inc v. Filipino Reporter Enterprises Inc Libertito Pelayo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether the specific language in issue has a precise meaning which is readily understood; (2) whether the statements are capable of being proven true or false; and (3) whether either the full context of the communication in which the statement appears or the broader social context and surrounding circumstances are such as to signal readers or listeners that what is being read or heard is likely to be opinion, not fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[p]laintiff has repeatedly pled that the January 3 and 4 Statement were made with malice and knowledge of their falsity ... [and] has therefore pled sufficient facts to show a plausible defeat of any qualified privilege defense”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.