Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 165 Ga. App. 53 - Tuggle v. State

165 Ga. App. 53 - Tuggle v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2006
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rawlins v. State · Fletcher v. State · Pressley v. State · Robinson v. State · 116 Ga. App. 479 - Norrell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A mere incriminating statement is made where the accused, though admitting to damaging circumstances, nonetheless attempts to deny responsibility for the crime charged by putting forward exculpatory or legally justifying facts. Thus, [a] statement which includes facts or circumstances which show excuse or justification is not a confession of guilt even if it admits the main fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.