Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 165 Ga. App. 790 - Wright v. State

165 Ga. App. 790 - Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2003
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2003

10 state decisions

60198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bacon v. State · 141 Ga. App. 725 - Brooks v. State · 153 Ga. App. 769 - Burke v. State · 153 Ga. App. 729 - High v. State · 155 Ga. App. 563 - Rakestraw v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`When one is on trial charged with the commission of a crime, proof of a distinct, independent, and separate offense is never admissible, unless there is some logical connection between the two, from which it can be said that proof of the one tends to establish the other.' [Cit.] `Once the identity of the accused as the perpetrator of the offense separate and distinct from the one for which he is on trial has been proven, testimony concerning the independent crime may be admitted for the purpose of showing identity, motive, plan, scheme, bent of mind, and course of conduct. [Cits.]'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In view of the similarities between the crime charged and the independent crimes, evidence of the latter was admissible to show common motive, plan or scheme.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.