Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 165 Ill. App. 3d 1052 - People v. Crain

165 Ill. App. 3d 1052 - People v. Crain’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
September 1993
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 13 Ill. App. 3d 232 - People v. Jackson · 134 Ill. App. 3d 1048 - People v. Jones · 26 Ill. 2d 337 - The PEOPLE v. Nelson · 132 Ill. App. 2d 766 - People v. May

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A sentencing court is not obligated to attempt to foresee and anticipate defendant's actions on probation which might constitute a subsequent violation of the law and advise him of the consequences of those actions. If the court could foresee the defendant committing a felony while on probation, the defendant should be imprisoned rather than admitted to probation in the first place. Id. at 1136 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.