Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 165 IND 255 - Porter v. Roseman

Porter v. Roseman’s Empirical Analysis

1905

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
16
states following
May 2007
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently May 2007 · most notably 94 Ind. App. 461 - Terre Haute Trust Co. v. Scott, Rec. (1932), KMK Factoring, L.L.C. v. McKnew (In Re McKnew) (2001)

5 federal appellate · 58 state decisions — followed in 16 states

19019051910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Chicago Rolling Mill Co. v. St. Louis Ore & Steel Co. · Alexander v. Swackhamer · Pearce v. Dill · Bank of Antigo v. Union Trust Co. · Quick v. Lemon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Appellee thus having .in his possession money which ex aequo et bono belonged and ought to have been returned to appellant, an action for money had and received might have been well brought for its recovery; and it was not material how the money came into his hands, if the plaintiff is justly entitled to receive it. In such a case the law implies a promise to pay.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “money, having reached the ... [plaintiff] without authority or right, remained as much his property in the hands of [the plaintiff] as it was in the hands of Mount[.] ... [The plaintiff's] innocence and good faith afford no protection against the rightful owner who has been tortiously dispossessed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.