Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 165 KAN 674 - Fry v. Hudspeth

Fry v. Hudspeth’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
May 1969
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Badders · Rorerts v. State · Muskogee County v. United States · State v. Mowry · Cochran v. Simpson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . The preliminary examination in a felony case is not a trial in the sense that word ordinarily is used. (16 C. J. 316, 323.) It is purely statutory, since it was unknown at common law. (16 C. J. 314.) It is not judicial, and authority to conduct such examination may be vested in persons other than courts (16 C. J. 319), such as mayors (R. S. 62-201). . . .” (l. c. 685.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.