Maddox v. Robbert’s Empirical Analysis
1928
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently November 2014
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Griffin & Dyson v. Cowan, Dykers & Co. · Coignet v. Nelson · Hughes v. Harrison · Union National Bank v. Succession of Lee · Scott v. McDougall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is a mistake to say that the title or ownership of a note can only be transferred by an indorsement or written assignment. “It was held, as far back as 1830, that a note payable to order may be transferred without indorsement, and that the transfer can be proved by parol testimony. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.