Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 165 MICH 509 - Longo v. Crachiola

Longo v. Crachiola’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 1914
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ross v. Miner · Fruit Dispatch Co. v. Russo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The gist of the plaintiffs’ cause of action, as stated in the declaration, is that defendant purchased the plaintiffs’ goods, with the intent on his part, at the time of the purchase, not to pay for them, in pursuance of a general scheme to buy fruit and defraud the vendors out of their pay. The evidence tended to support the cause of action, and it was error to direct a verdict for defendant. Fruit Despatch Co. v. Russo, 125 Mich. 306 [ 84 N. W. 308 ]; Ross v. Miner, 67 Mich. 410 [ 35 N. W. 60 ].””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.