Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 165 Minn. 134 - Hackert v. Prescott

Hackert v. Prescott’s Empirical Analysis

1925

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
4
states following
November 1981
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 1981

7 state decisions

301925193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Armstead v. Lounsberry · Day v. Duluth Street Railway Co. · Heiden v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. · Flaaten v. Lyons · Kennedy v. Webster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * canllot be said as a matter of law that the boy was guilty of contributory negligence. [He] does not belong to that class of persons for whose benefit the ordinance was enacted. It was to protect pedestrians. * * *””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.