Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 165 Minn. 248 - Harding v. Shapiro

Harding v. Shapiro’s Empirical Analysis

1925

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
October 2001
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2001

8 state decisions

20192519301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hoel v. Flour City Fuel & Transfer Co. · Steenson v. Flour City Fuel & Transfer Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * insecure and easily broken fastenings may amount to an invitation. It is so easy to cut a 3/8 inch chain, even though it be of steel, that it would be presumptuous for us to say as a matter of law that the use of such a chain, exposed as was this one to burglarious attack, to protect property stored with a bailee for hire, is due care as a matter of law. We consider the question one of fact.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.