Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 165 MONT 274 - SPRANKLE v. DeCOCK

SPRANKLE v. DeCOCK’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1990
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pickett v. Kyger · George v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co. · Knowlton v. Sandaker · Stevens v. WalDorf-Hoerner Paper Products Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Viewing the plaintiff’s evidence in the light most favorable to him it is susceptible of but one conclusion — he climbed onto a farmhand loader and hoisted a long metal pole into contact with high overhead power lines which were clearly visible,, which he had lived and worked around for eight years. While admittingly knowing any electrical line was dangerous he did not exercise ordinary care for his safety under the circumstances, which failure proximately caused his injuries.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.