Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 165 N.C. 224 - Aman v. . Walker

Aman v. . Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably 131 N.C. App. 168 - Norman Owen Trucking, Inc. v. Morkoski (1998), 40 N.C. App. 120 - Nytco Leasing, Inc. v. Southeastern Motels, Inc. (1979)

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 28 state decisions

8019141920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . If the conveyance is voluntary, and the grantor did not retain property fully, sufficient and available to pay his debts then existing, it is invalid as to creditors; . . .””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If the conveyance is *Page 373 upon a valuable consideration and made with the actual intent to defraud creditors upon the part of the grantor alone, not participated in by the grantee and of which intent he had no notice, it is valid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “If the conveyance is voluntary, and the grantor retains property fully sufficient and available to pay his debts then existing, and there is no actual intent to defraud, the conveyance is valid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.