Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 165 N.C. App. 321 - State v. Hedgepeth

165 N.C. App. 321 - State v. Hedgepeth’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Modjeski & Masters, Applicant, V · State v. Bagley · State v. Collins · State v. Herring · State v. Weaver

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he definitions accorded the crimes determine whether one crime is a lesser included offense of another crime. In other words, all of the essential elements of the lesser crime must also be essential elements included in the greater crime. If the lesser crime has an essential element which is not completely covered by the greater crime, it is not a lesser included offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.