165 N.C. App. 469 - Vaughn v. INSULATING SERVICES’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Adams v. AVX Corp. · Deese v. Champion International Corp. · 108 N.C. App. 762 - Russell v. Lowes Product Distribution · Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings Yarn · Adams v. AVX CORPORATION
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In any case where compensation is payable for an occupational disease, the employer in whose employment the employee was last injuriously exposed to the hazards of such disease, and the insurance carrier, if any, which was on the risk when the employee was so last exposed under such employer, shall be liable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“To recover under this statute, the plaintiff must show: (1) that he has a compensable occupational disease and (2) that he was last injuriously exposed to the hazards of such disease in defendant-employer's employment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'unreasonable to assume that the legislature intended an employee to bear the burden of making toxicity measurements during his employment in order to lay the groundwork for a worker's compensation claim'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.