| People v Wright |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 03012 |
| Decided on May 4, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on May 4, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.
2019-10651
(Ind. No. 180/18)
v
Daniel Wright, appellant.
¶1Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.
¶2Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Deborah A. Brenner and Kevin Osowski of counsel), for respondent.
¶3DECISION & ORDER
¶4Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Douglas Wong, J.), imposed November 30, 2018, upon his convictions of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.
¶5ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.
¶6We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).
¶7DUFFY, J.P., ROMAN, MALTESE and FORD, JJ., concur.
ENTER:¶8Maria T. Fasulo
¶9Clerk of the Court