Cook v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2024
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dresher v. Burt · Temple v. Wean United, Inc. · 101 Ohio App. 3d 38 - Coventry Township v. Ecker · 94 Ohio App. 3d 579 - Koos v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc. · 139 Ohio App. 3d 231 - Helman v. Epl Prolong, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Procedural rules adopted by courts are designed to promote the administration of justice and to eliminate undue delay.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[c]ourts of appeals `cannot and will not search the record in order to make arguments on appellant['s] behalf'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“may disregard an assignment of error presented for review if the party raising it * * * fails to argue the assignment separately in the brief, as required under App.R. 16(A).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re J.P.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.