State v. Huffman’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably State v. Tooley (2007), 7 So. 3d 1119 - State v. Brabson (2008)
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Thompkins · State v. Jenks · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Kolender v. Lawson · Tibbs v. Florida
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In this case, the state presented evidence of two digital videos of a 16-year-old gill as she used Huffman’s tanning facilities on two different dates. The images were captured by a camera hidden behind a fan near the tanning bed. The camera was positioned to focus on the girl’s genitals. During the recording of one of the videos, the camera was manually adjusted to capture a clearer image of the girl’s genitals. Given the secretive nature of the videotaping and its blatant focus on the victim’s genitals, we hold that the state presented sufficient evidence of lewdness to sustain Huffman’s convictions for illegal use of a minor in nudity-oriented material or performance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“persuaded by the reasoning of the Ninth Appellate District in State v. Morris [Wayne App. No. 04CA0036, 2005-Ohio-599 ], in which the court rejected an overbreath challenge to R.C. 2907.322.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that R.C. 2907.322 (A)(1) is not unconstitutionally overbroad.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.