Beverly v. Parilla’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently January 2023 · most notably Kelly v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. (2007), 216 F. App'x 495 - Urban Associates, Inc. v. Standex Electronics, Inc. (2007)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Seasons Coal Co. v. City of Cleveland · Aultman Hospital Ass'n v. Community Mutual Insurance · Davis v. Loopco Industries, Inc. · Trinova Corp. v. Pilkington Bros., P.L.C. · Fletcher v. Fletcher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“ambiguous if it is unclear, indefinite, and reasonably subject to dual interpretations or is of such doubtful meaning that reasonable minds could disagree as to its meaning.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“[L]anguage is unambiguous if, from reading only the four corners of the instrument, the language is clear, definite, and subject to only one interpretation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“She contrasts her situation with appellee's, noting that he has numerous income sources, such as a pension of almost $1,400 per month after taxes, approximately $1,400 per month in Social Security, and $1,800 per month in rental income (minus utilities and expenses) from his several properties. She also notes that he owns a tree farm with a $600 mortgage. And she opines that this farm has income potential. {¶ 44}”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.