165 Ohio App. 3d 91 - State v. Trewartha’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
77 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably State v. Paskins (2022), State v. Smith (2011)
77 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Thompkins · State v. Jenks · State v. Taylor · Jordan v. Arizona · State v. Campbell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Consistency between verdicts on several counts of an indictment is unnecessary where the defendant is convicted on one or some counts and acquitted on others; the conviction generally will be upheld irrespective of its rational incompatibility with the acquittal.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Douthitt · State v. Rardon“must review the entire record, weigh the evidence and all reasonable inferences, consider the credibility of witnesses and determine whether in resolving conflicts in the evidence, the trier of fact clearly lost its way and created such a manifest miscarriage of justice that the conviction must be reversed and a new trial ordered.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bruce · State v. Smith“[e]ach count of a multi[-]count indictment is deemed distinct and independent of all other counts, and thus inconsistent verdicts on different counts do not justify overturning a verdict of guilt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith · State v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.