Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 165 SO2D 209 - Van Hoose v. Robbins

Van Hoose v. Robbins’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 1994
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 1994

8 state decisions

301964197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Baker v. Clifford-Mathew Investment Co. · Seven Seas Frozen Products v. Fast Frozen Foods · Adelhelm v. Dougherty · Waits v. Orange Creek Turpentine Corp. · 117 So. 2d 519 - Huckleberry v. Davis Double Seal Jalousies, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Absent abandonment or voluntary relinquishment of the leasehold, the lándlord’s right to re-enter precedent to taking possession should appear as a matter of contract or be established by prescribed legal process. Neither the answer nor the counterclaim in this case supplied the allegations necessary to effectively deny plaintiffs alleged right to possession. (Id. at 211-212, emphasis by the court).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Distress for rent is a common law remedy and one of the rare cases in which the law allowed `a man to be his own avenger, or to minister redress to himself.' 3 Cooley's Blackstone 3d Ed. 5. This common law remedy of distress for rent, existing without statute and creating a lien upon seizure of the tenant's property, has been superseded in most jurisdictions, as in Florida, by a statutory remedy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Fla. Stat. § 83.08 , F.S.A. does not provide or confirm in the landlord a self-executing possessory lien; and that the promulgation of statutory distress under said Chapter 83, viewed in the light of Fla. Stat. § 2.01 , F.S.A., effectively superseded common law distress — at least in cases where abandonment by the tenant is not clearly evident.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.