Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

165 So. 2d 893

De Shazo v. Cantrelle

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1964

Louisiana Court of Appeal · decided 1964-06-01

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1970

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1964-06-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

¶2It has been brought to our attention by an application for rehearing that the defendant Cantrelle did not appeal from the judgment of the lower court, but merely answered the appeal of his codefendant Hardware Mutual Casualty Company praying that the judgment appealed from be affirmed.

¶3We concede our error in reducing the quantum since there was no appeal therefrom by the defendant Cantrelle, who alone is left the party cast, since we have found his codefendant not liable.

¶4Therefore, insofar as our judgment reduces the award in favor of Mrs. Mildred Migaud, widow of Reginald De Shazo, individually and as tutrix for Jacqueline De Shazo, from $3,600.00 to $2,000.00 for injuries, the same be now corrected and amended so as to affirm the judgment of the trial court as to quantum of damages.

¶5Decree amended; rehearing denied.

/165/so2d/893 · .json · Public domain