165 So. 3d 1044 - State v. Mead’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · State Ex Rel. Melinie v. State · State v. Dorthey · State v. Parker · State Ex Rel. Jackson v. Henderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). This circumstance typically arises when a defendant is convicted of multiple counts but fails to receive a sentence as to each count. See, e.g., State v. Williams, 12-0050, p. 8 (La.App. 4 Cir, 1/16/13), 108 So.3d 319, 326 . See also State v. Patterson, 384 So.2d 790, 791 (La. 1980) (per curiam). .The fact that a law may-change after the commission of the crime to lower the possible penalty”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“does not extinguish liability for the offense committed under the former statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.