165 So. 3d 260 - Ramirez v. Evonir, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Herlitz Const. Co., Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc. · 68 So. 3d 1099 - Favrot v. Favrot · 81 So. 3d 923 - Palumbo v. Shapiro · 5 So. 3d 927 - Lalla v. Calamar, N.V. · Livingston Downs Racing v. La. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(i) The motion for appeal has been filed within the thirty-day time period allowed for the filing of an application for supervisory writs under Rule 4-3 of the Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal. (ii) ... [T]he circumstances indicate that an immediate decision of the issue sought to be appealed is necessary to ensure fundamental fairness and [¿judicial efficiency, such as where reversal of the trial court’s decision would terminate the litigation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The proper procedural vehicle to seek immediate review of ... an undesignated partial summary judgment rendered under Article 966 E is by application for supervisory relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“An appeal can be dismissed at any time when 'there is no right to appeal.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.