Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

165 So. 3d 69

State ex rel. Rouchon v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 17, 2015

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2015-04-17

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2015

1 state decisions

Relies on 475 So. 2d 336 - State v. Counterman · Jones v. Hawkins · State v. Glasper

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2015-04-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Bossier, 26th Judicial *70District Court Div. B, No. 191,570; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 49387-KH.

¶21 iWrit denied.

¶3JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.

¶4HUGHES, J., would grant and assigns reasons.

HUGHES, J.,

¶5would grant the writ.

¶6|! Respectfully, I would appoint counsel for purposes of holding a hearing at which it will be determined whether relator is entitled to an out-of-time appeal under the rule of State v. Counterman, 475 So.2d 336, 340 (La.1985) (out-of-time appeal may be appropriate in cases in which either “the defendant was not substantially notified at sentencing of his right to appeal or those in Which the defense attorney was at fault in failing to file or perfect a timely appeal.”). See, e.g., State ex rel. Bonnee v. State, 00-2769 (La.12/14/01), 803 So.2d 980; State ex rel. Fabro v. State, 98-0884 (La.9/4/98), 723 So.2d 425. I would consider relator’s application as one for post-conviction relief.

/165/so3d/69 · .json · Public domain