Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

165 So. 3d 916

In re Peters

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 22, 2015

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2015-05-22

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2019

5 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2015-05-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM.

¶2| T Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which respondent acknowledges that he violated the following provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct: Rules 4.1(a), 8.4(a), 8.4(c), and 8.4(d). Having reviewed the petition,

¶3IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that John Roumain Peters, III, Louisiana Bar Roll number 21810, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months, fully deferred.

¶4IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

CRICHTON, J., dissents and assigns reasons.
/165/so3d/916 · .json · Public domain