165 S.W. 462
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided April 1, 1914
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1914-04-01
<p>Ceiminal Law (§ 1090*) — Appeal—Statement of Facts — Bill oe Exceptions.</p> <p>Rulings on the admission and sufficiency of evidence cannot be reviewed, in the absence of a statement of facts or bill of exceptions.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent.. Dig. §§ 2653, 2789, 2803-2822, 2825-2827, 2927, 2928, 2948, 3204; Dec. Dig. § 1090.*]</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1914-04-01
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1930
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Appellant was convicted of burglary; her punishment being assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.
¶2The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. Therefore the grounds of the motion with reference to the sufficiency of the evidence and- admission and rejection of testimony cannot be considered.
¶3There being no revisable errors in the record, the judgment is affirmed.