Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 165 SW2D 449 - Scott v. Walden

Scott v. Walden’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
3
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 2017

22 state decisions

8019421950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Trust Co., Indp. Exctr. v. Bauereisen · Pure Oil Co. v. Crabb · Hughes v. Rhodes · Ryan v. Kent · First Nat. Bank of Amarillo v. Rush

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘It is proper to consider parol testimony as to the circumstances surrounding the parties out of which the contracts grew, not to add to or vary their terms, but to apply the contracts to the subjects with which they deal for the purpose of ascertaining the real intention of the parties.’”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.