Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

165 S.W.3d 539

Clements v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 2005

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2005-06-28

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 2011

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-06-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2The movant, Alvena Clements, appeals the motion court’s judgment denying her Rule 24.085 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

¶3We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).

/165/sw3d/539 · .json · Public domain