Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

165 Tex. Crim. 153

306 S.W.2d 132

Ex Parte Foight

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 16, 1957

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1957-10-16

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 1979

6 state decisions

Relies on Martin v. State · Ex parte Erwin · 159 Tex. Crim. 235 - Ex Parte Goss

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1957-10-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

WOODLEY, Judge.

¶1 Relator seeks his discharge from the penitentiary where he has served more than five years of a life sentence for robbery with firearms.

¶2 Under the prior holdings of this court we have no alternative other than to order his discharge, and the state so confesses.

¶3*154 The authorities holding the life sentence excessive, and the portion thereof in excess of the five year minimum void, include Ex parte Erwin, 145 Texas Cr. Rep. 504, 170 S.W. 2d 226; Ex parte O’Dare, 146 Texas Cr. Rep. 162, 172 S.W. 2d 336; Ex parte Wheat, 146 Texas Cr. Rep. 171, 172 S.W. 2d 344; Daugherty v. State, 146 Texas Cr. Rep. 303, 174 S.W. 2d 493; Ex parte Whitten, 151 Texas Cr. Rep. 169, 205 S.W. 2d 588; Ex parte Geisling, Texas Cr. App., 243 S.W. 2d 833; Ex parte Goss, 159 Texas Cr. Rep. 235, 262 S.W. 2d 412. See also Ex parte Rolen, 163 Texas Cr. Rep. 525, 294 S.W. 2d 403; Cuellar v. State, 151 Texas Cr. Rep. 176, 206 S.W. 2d 250; and Belton v. State, 162 Texas Cr. Rep. 436, 286 S.W. 2d 432.

¶4 The writ is granted and the relator is ordered discharged from further confinement under said life sentence.

¶5 Presiding Judge Morrison dissents.

/165/texcrim/153 · .json · Public domain